Yet again, political violence has struck America. Charlie Kirk was murdered at a public speaking event a few days ago. I personally did not know much about Mr. Kirk. From what I have learned about him, I probably would have disagreed with him on almost every talking point. Yet, I mourn his loss and the loss to his young family through yet another senseless act of violence played out on the political stage. In a book written before I was born, Government By Assassination, the author outlined how the Japanese government reshaped itself into a despotic world power through a series of political murders. I think of that book in the context of today, and shudder.
Political violence in America is a serious problem. But are we really going to keep score? Making violence a political issue in the first place rachets up the rhetoric. Both sides are guilty. Remember, we watched January 6, 2021, unfold in real time, then saw our president pardon almost all the riotous conspirators. It seems hypocritical for people on the right to be pointing fingers at people on the left after the extreme and abominable act of one human being. When Paul Pelosi was attacked by a single person, I don't remember hearing Biden or any other fellow democrats calling for wide-spread investigations of anyone who did not automatically express sympathy for the then Speaker's husband or her.
88% of Americans oppose political violence. That opposition goes across the board. The Cato Institute reports that 54% of violent acts that qualify as politically motivated are done by people with extreme views on the Right. Yet the rhetoric we hear claims it is the Left that encourages violence. It is a glass house. Everyone should put down their stones.
I grew up in what I call the “We Interrupt This Program” generation. Every time our TV screens flashed that phrase, we knew someone had died, usually violently. I hope we aren't re-entering that era. The difference then was that our leaders sought to unify, heal, and lead us beyond our shock and grief, not throw kerosine on the flames with generalities and hate.
The scariest part of the aftermath to Charlie Kirk's assassination is a spreading message that everyone must mourn his loss regardless of their feelings about his views. People are being fired from their jobs for having an opinion that runs contrary to what our president and his cabinet members want us to think. When John Kennedy was murdered, most but not everybody mourned his death. That was their right. Charlie Kirk believed in his own right to free speech. He invited others to join him, to dialogue. He was robbed of that. It insults his memory to deny free speech to anyone else, regardless of how you feel about the speaker.